The only vice presidential debate of the 2024 VP debate took place in New York City on October 1, 2024, with JD Vance, the Republican candidate, and Tim Walz, the Democratic nominee, exchanging views on immigration, abortion, and democracy. The debate was marked by a largely respectful tone, though moments of tension arose as both candidates sought to differentiate their policy visions. Voters appeared sharply divided on who won the night, reflecting broader political polarization.
Immigration and Border Control
Vance’s Perspective:
JD Vance opened his debate remarks by addressing the ongoing immigration crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border. Vance argued for reinstating policies that had been effective under former President Donald Trump, including enhanced border security measures and targeted deportations. He made it clear that stopping the influx of illegal migrants should be the first priority, emphasizing criminal deportation as a key follow-up.
“Before we talk about deportations, we have to stop the bleeding.”
-JD Vance, 2024 VP Debate
Walz’s Response:
Tim Walz took a different approach, arguing that while immigration reform is necessary, a balance must be struck between border security and human rights. He suggested that punitive measures alone were not enough and that compassion should guide the process of immigration reform. His stance resonated more with Democratic voters and younger independents.
“We need to focus on creating a system that protects both our borders and the people coming to this country in search of safety.”
-Tim Walz, 2024 VP Debate
Abortion and Women’s Rights
Vance on Abortion:
JD Vance was challenged on his pro-life stance but presented a compassionate approach, sharing a personal story of someone close to him who had an abortion. Vance insisted that the debate should focus on expanding options for women, such as increased financial support, rather than simply promoting abortion access. While some of his views were controversial, particularly regarding rape and incest exceptions, Vance framed his policies as rooted in empathy.
“There’s so much that we can do to give women more options, but the sanctity of life must be protected.”
-JD Vance, 2024 VP debate
Walz’s Counterargument:
Tim Walz reaffirmed his pro-choice stance, pointing to Ohio’s referendum that supported access to abortion as proof that Americans favor the right to choose. Walz argued that restricting abortion, even with additional public policy measures, would ultimately harm women, particularly those in abusive situations. His views were well-received among younger and more progressive voters, though independents appeared divided.
“Women must be trusted to make their own decisions. Government should not interfere with such personal choices.”
-Tim Walz, 2024 VP Debate
Democracy and January 6th
Vance’s Defense of Trump and Focus on Censorship:
When asked about the January 6th insurrection, JD Vance pivoted to what he framed as a more pressing issue: censorship. He argued that while the transition of power occurred peacefully, the real threat to democracy lies in the silencing of dissenting voices, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Vance’s remarks found strong support among Republicans but drew skepticism from independent and Democratic voters.
“The bigger threat to democracy is censorship, not peaceful protesters exercising their right.”
-JD Vance, 2024 VP Debate
Walz’s Response on January 6th:
Tim Walz criticized Vance for not directly condemning Trump’s actions during the 2020 election aftermath. Walz framed the events of January 6th as a direct assault on democratic principles and argued that Vance’s deflection on the issue was emblematic of a broader refusal within the Republican Party to acknowledge Trump’s role in undermining faith in U.S. elections.
“January 6th was a dark day for our country, and we cannot overlook the importance of defending democracy.”
-Tim Walz, 2024 VP debate
Economic Vision
Vance’s Economic Policies:
JD Vance emphasized the strength of the Trump economy, pointing to low taxes, high growth, and national stability as key indicators of success. He reiterated his belief that returning to those policies would bring the country back to a more prosperous state.
“Under Trump, we had economic stability and peace. That’s what I want to restore for America.”
-JD Vance, 2024 VP Debate
Walz’s Economic Argument:
Tim Walz highlighted the Biden-Harris administration’s economic successes, such as infrastructure investments and efforts to curb inflation. He acknowledged ongoing challenges but argued that the long-term benefits of these policies outweighed short-term difficulties.
“Our investments are building the foundation for a stronger, more equitable future.”
-Tim Walz, 2024 VP Debate
Conclusion: No Clear Winner, A Nation Divided
The debate did little to sway voters away from their partisan preferences, as JD Vance’s focused, controlled performance played well with Republicans and some independents, while Tim Walz appealed more to younger voters and Democrats. Polls taken after the debate showed a near even split, reflecting the broader polarization within the electorate. Both candidates remained committed to their respective visions for the country, making it clear that this race remains highly competitive.
| Group | Support for JD Vance | Support for Tim Walz |
| Democratic | 5% | 72% |
| Republican | 90% | 5% |
| Independent | 42% | 58% |
Key Takeaway
While neither candidate landed a knockout blow, JD Vance’s controlled, policy-driven performance likely helped cut into his high negatives, improving his image as a vice-presidential candidate. Tim Walz, meanwhile, appealed to progressive voters, particularly on social issues and women’s rights, but struggled to break through with independents. The debate reflected a broader national divide, leaving the election outcome uncertain as the campaigns enter the final stretch.
